License Denied, Melodie Scott back to work

Studies estimate that 50% of elderly American are victims of financial exploitation while only 4% to 15% case are ever reported. Financial swindles are one of the fastest growing forms of abuse of the elderly according to NCEA.
An example of fraud is the situation where one influences a testator that another relative has stirred up trouble....statements.
Financial exploitation should be considered if the patient has suddenly transferred assets to a family member.
John 8:32 "Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
1 Corinthians 13:12-13 "And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love."
Romans 13:8 "Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another."Leviticus 19:32 "Rise in the presense of the aged, show respect for the elderly."
Bhagavad Gita Chapter 17 "For the sake of respect, honor, veneration and indeed pride is said to be of ... superiors like the father and mother, and in cleanliness, simplicity, and nonviolence."Pindar (522 BC - 443 BC) A graceful and honorable old age is the childhood of immortality.
Carol Matthau There is no old age. There is, as there always was, just you.Booth Tarkington (1869 - 1946) "Cherish all your happy moments; they make a fine cushion for old age."
Gloria Pitzer About the only thing that comes to us without effort is old age."Make wisdom your provision for the journey from youth to old age, for it is a more certain support than all other possessions."
3 comments:
HONORABLE STEPHEN D. CUNNISON PRESIDING.
CLERK: L. STONE
COURT REPORTER: S. LAYTON
MELODIE Z SCOTT REPRESENTED BY DAVID HORSPOOL.
PUBLIC GUARDIAN REPRESENTED BY TONI L. EGGEBRAATEN AND ELIZABETH AQUARIAN.
NO APPEARANCE BY JANET PHELAN.
AT 01:45 THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HEARD:
THE COURT HAS BECOME AWARE OF A CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE (CCP SECTION 170.1) FILED BY JANET C.
PHELAN, DAUGHTER OF THE CONSERVATEE. THE CHALLENGE WAS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF CLERK OF
THE COURT BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION ON MAY 5, 2010, AT 10:35 A.M.
THE CHALLENGE IS STRICKEN ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS:
1. IT HAS NOT BEEN PERSONALLY SERVED ON THE
JUDGE ALLEGED TO BE DISQUALIFIED (JUDGE STEPHEN D. CUNNISON) OR ON HIS CLERK (CCP SECTION 170.3
(C)(1)), AND THE TIME FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE HEARING HAS PASSED.
2. IT WAS NOT PRESENTED AT THE EARLIEST PRACTICABLE
OPPORTUNITY AFTER DISCOVERY OF THE FACTS CONSTITUTING THE GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION
(CCP SECTION 170.3 (C)(1)). THE RECORD DISCLOSES THAT, AFTER THE AUGUST 1, 2002,
HEARING OF WHICH MS. PHELAN COMPLAINS, SHE AGAIN APPEARED AT A HEARING IN THIS CASE BEFORE JUDGE
CUNNISON ON OCTOBER 24, 2002, BY WHICH TIME SHE MUST HAVE BEEN AWARE OF ALL OF THE FACTS
CONSTITUTING THE GROUNDS FOR HER OBJECTION, AND SHE RAISED NO OBJECTION. THE PRESENT HEARING
WAS NOTICED FOR APRIL 26, 2010. SHE FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING, BUT ON THE
BASIS OF HER TELEPHONED REQUEST, THE HEARING WAS CONTINUED BY ORDER OF JUDGE CUNNISON TO BE HEARD
IN HIS DEPARTMENT ON MAY 5, 2010.
JANET PHELAN WAS GIVEN NOTICE OF THE CONTINUANCE, MAILED ON APRIL 26, 2010. SHE FILED A DOCUMENT
TITLED "JUDICIAL NOTICE" ON MAY 3, 2010, BUT FAILED TO FILE HER CHALLENGE UNTIL THE DAY OF
THE HEARING.
COURT FINDS AND ORDERS:
PETITION FOR COMPELLING TO REPORT AND SURCHARGE OF TRUSTEE IS DENIED
PRINT MINUTE ORDER
Since you have posted these details about my case, you should be made aware that the hearing you referenced was illegal in its entirety. I was not served with proper notice--indeed, I could not be, given that the hearing was rescheduled on AƱril 26th for May 5th which does not provide proper time for service of one living outside of the country. The court was apprised of this but decided to rush this through, illegal as it was. And the fact is that I asked Judge Cunnison to recuse himself in October of 2002--did he not mention that here? No he did not. So, he lied. Is anyone surprised?
Janet Phelan is a wanna be heard journalists. She is consistently posting unfounded information and constantly being denied information. Her information and reporting is obsured and she needs to get off the internet. No one cares what she has to say and/or her non-factual reporting. She has run to Cananda to get away from all the threats she makes to officals and runs and hides then posts stories that are unfounded and inappropriate.
Post a Comment