Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Checks and Balances for Judges and Attorneys Must be Put in Place

Albany, New York

Our custom of NOT holding Judges and lawyers accountable is bearing bitter fruits according to the daily reports of corruption that are coming to our attention.

A former Supreme Court justice from Albany been indicted on charges of attempted extortion and federal bribery.

Sixty-five-year-old Thomas Spargo, a former justice in the Third Judicial Circuit of the State of New York, was indicted by a federal grand jury for a 2003 incident in which Spargo allegedly bribed an Ulster County lawyer.

According to the indictment, Spargo allegedly solicited $10,000 from the attorney while he was a state Supreme Court Justice. The attorney, who had cases pending before Spargo, reportedly paid the money in fear that Spargo would use his title and influence to harm him if he did not pay.

Source=>>

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Estate Looting of the Rich and Famous And How it can Happen to You

By Lou Ann Anderson
US~Observer Investigative Journalist


The legal profession is not generally well regarded. A particularly heinous sub-culture surrounds the probate industry in which lawyers and select clients (wannabe heirs, disgruntled family members, etc.) use probate venues and/or estate planning instruments (wills, trusts, guardianships) to perpetrate Involuntary Redistribution of Assets (IRA) actions – or more simply put, to loot assets of the dead or disabled/incapacitated.

Read it all here=>>

Political Office to the Highest Bidder , Just Don't get Caught. Do it on the Sly.. Todays Politics

Washington, DC -- December 9, 2008

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued the following statement today in response to the arrest of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich:

"There has been an air of lawlessness around Governor Blagojevich for some time and Judicial Watch applauds U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald for his actions.

"Blagojevich's corruption is no surprise, but its breadth and depravity is shocking. The alleged efforts to sell the Senate seat of Barack Obama are outrageous, but also seem to implicate many other powerful politicians and political players. Especially disturbing are the questions the scandal raises about Barack Obama and his close associates.

"This is a burgeoning crisis for Obama that should shake his presidency to its core.

"The criminal complaint filed today indicates that Obama and his team knew about Blagojevich's efforts to sell Obama's Senate seat. ("Tony" Rezko, Obama friend, fundraiser and real estate partner, is once again implicated in the corrupt activities exposed today.)

"Did Obama report Blagojevich to investigators about any efforts to sell his Senate seat?"

Judicial Watch has been investigating Rod Blagojevich for over two years and has ongoing open records litigation concerning the sale of government jobs for which he was arrested today. Blagojevich has stonewalled and refused to turn over documents to Judicial Watch that could have alerted the American people to his corruption.

Press Office 202-646-5188Contact:

In view of the blatant corruption in the legal system where everything is for sale should we act surprised? Besides we sell seats to the NYSE why not to the Senate and Chief Judge Seats? The One who brings the most money to the party gets to seat in the chair....
Are you disgusted yet? We can't help but wonder what is it going to take for Americans to wake up from their deep slumber and take back their country from the opportunists,looters, and grave robbers.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Been a Victim In Florida ?

If you or anyone you know has been a victim in Florida and has a story to tell contact us.

Florida Victims We are opening a Radio Talk Show dedicated to bringing people' story's out to help them.

www.floridacorruptionradio.com/

We will air shows every Wednesday 9-11pm, Thursdays 9-11pm, Friday 9-11 pm and Saturdays 9-11pm

Those of you who would like to listen to this live broadcast but will not have internet access can dial 1-724-444-7444

when it asks for code or id press in 33997 then #

The Dumbing Down of America


"According to studies the nation's school children over the last 30 years proportion of children reading below the basic level has hovered around 35% with 70% never attain reading proficiency (NAEP, 2007).

This translates into adults go into midlife poorly equipped to take care of their parents or make crucial; decisions for them.

According to study by the National Guardianship Association, titled "Emerging Trends , The Relative Are Restless" Download here=>>.pdf
by Terry Hammond, Executive Director and Steven D. Fields and presented to the 16th Annual Probate Bar makes this point. "there is something wrong with the relatives who are willing to serve."

Yes, the inferences from reading the report is that there is something wrong with the American public, they are dysfunctional, ungrateful, and disgruntled and by default totally un-qualified to take care of their parents ."

That was by design, and how is it that heirs have to defend their rights of inheritance to the state, a court, a guardianship business and it's minions?

Was that comment about "their expected inheritance" in the report meant to make children and grand children feelguilty? It seems to me, that that entity has an inordinate, unwarranted sense of entitlement.

This "Dumbing Down of America," was by DESIGN, and yes, it started in earnest about 50-35 yrs. ago. There are many ex-teachers, Superintendents, Principles, Administrators who have written books about it. Public schools are another arm of Gov't which is charged with the "social engineering," behavioral conditioning of the populace.

The beginning philosophy, those who started the system of compulsory schooling (Carnegie, Rockefeller, Ford, J.P. Morgan,etc.) along with the wild eyed Utopian, Thomas Hobbes, had a particular agenda. It was to educate(train) children enough so that they would become producers and consumers, but not so much that they become educated enough to be independent, critical thinkers. Those could become a danger to those "social engineers," who'd like to keep,and grow their empires.

As time progressed, children were taught lessand less. They are now deprived of their history, and the ability to communicate, besides much, much more. Today many people are bewildered by what has happened to their families and themselves (As was I).

They believed that the Constitution is supposed to protect them. That really was it's purpose. To see how other/or elderly family members later were sucked into this: But, about 1796 "elements" interposed themselves in the FAMILY in ways never seen anywhere before. In Connecticut Superior court, was introduced "judicial discretion" along with a concept called "psychological parenthood," which was a radical notion without legal precedent which was used to support drastic, forcible intervention into family life.

These were poorly understood court rulings where courts MADE law instead of interpreting it. Rulings were later formalized by Know-Nothing legislators. This was a restructuring of family ordered by a judicial body without anypublic debate or consent.

This was the result of the dreams of Utopian writers and philosophers. The True Believers (dangerous). 1840 Justice Paige's opinion, with a strong state faith, "The moment a child is born it owes it's allegiance to the Gov't. of the country of it's birth (hmm is there a question right now about someone's birth place?)and is entitled to the 'protection' of the gov't. The fathers sovereign power passed to gov't of the state.

Power was transferred back for the convenience of the state but> their "guardianship" was limited to the legal duty of maintenance and education, but absolute sovereignty stayed with the state. Next came Children's courts and foster homes, probate courts to retrieve assets, and family courts to determine custody. But, CONCENTRATED effort was placed on putting as many buffering layers between biological members of families.

For all the people who think that "Surely the state, and courts want to keep families intact, think long and hard about, "for the convenience of the state (and all it's minions). School kids today are fodder for the "Combine" and will stand in parents and grandparent's places. The original precept was WRONG.


Famous Quotes.- "Lawyers Seldom Lawyer Anymore"

"Lawyers seldom lawyer anymore. They go along with the culture that stresses efficency over justice. Into this pleabargaining assemblyline culture we insert probate conservatorship law and the expediency concept seeps over and social costs are disregarded in the same way as everything else in our legal culture.

Sit in a criminal courtroom any day of the week and watch the parade of personal tragedy and broken lives that is routinely meted out every day.

The lawyers do not have the guts to try cases because too many can't. When that happens even honest judges are powerless. And all are habituated to injustice. The whole system needs an overhaul to increase the system capacity to deliver justice to all."

by Jeffrey R. Golin
jeffgolin@gmail.com
http://www.freenancy.com/

Sunday, December 7, 2008

South Carolina Most Violent State in the Nation, F.B.I. Says

GREENVILLE, S.C. -- Despite the fact that the murder rate in Greenville County has held steady in recent years, the violent crime outlook for much of the state is not nearly that good.

The FBI reported Monday that the state of South Carolina has the highest per capita rate of violent crime in the country.

He said many criminals are blaming the current economic situation for their choices.

"They have actually said it's because of the economy -- that they are out of work. They can't find a job. They have to put food on the table. They can't pay for rent," he said.

Source=>>

Friday, December 5, 2008

Responses range from Mild to Radical

revised 12-5-08

Responses to our posts continue to pour in from all 50 states in the USA and they range from moderate to downright hostile.

You take away somebody's mother, you rob them , you convert a legitimate inheritance into "legal fees" and what do you have? .- Someone that has nothing else to lose.

Although this topic evokes very emotional responses from people that have lost their parents from what they feel is prematurely, (such as myself) we can not "NOT" talk about it and hope the problem goes un noticed and goes way, it just isn't going to happen.


And if you pretend not to know, just google Probate Murders, or go to Supremelaw.Org and read about it ask Eric Baxter about the torture and murder of his father well documented here=>> or here=>> or read about Dr. Robert Sarhan hereto ignored pleas for help here=>> to bring his mother home and take her off dangerous medications that he knows are killing her , or Adele's Nightmare =>> or the many cases documented here too numerous to mention them all.........

But do understand that the indifference to our suffering and injustices being committed to our fathers and mothers are creating deep wounds within our society that threaten to tear us apart.


We can not change the way our victimized and their traumatized families feels anymore than we can change others, we can only change ourselves.Remember we are all a product of our environment.

I also have to live with Post Stress Syndrome and this is not an easy thing for any of us.

When I witnesses my parents who were in love like no other after 58 years separated without the benefit of a court order (something that we never thought could happen here) or any respect for their constitutional rights for the sole sake of taking their wealth, raiding their Trust thereby denying their grandchildren of their 25% share and their chance at a paid for College Education, this is very taxing experience for even the most rational of individuals.....
Not to mention destroying our lives, seeing my father die a slow torturous death asking for my mother everyday and then seeing our credit destroyed and everything we worked for ostracized , our mother incapacitated through neglect , well this has made me come to question everything I believed in.

We hope through our work to expose the injustices and make the courts take note, we do have a problem and it has to be addressed and investigated through the proper channels and it needs to be done and it needs to be done NOW!

BECAUSE we as Americans CAN NOT afford to continue to make radicals of our own citizens with wanton disregard polarizing, radicalizing millions of Americans by taking their parents and charging outrageous fees while doing so ?

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The Relatives are Restless it may be Because the Lawyers are Larcenous.

Here in the last weeks of 2008, we’re going through our files trying to catch up reporting on cases that have come in to us.

See the EoD News Archive for a tale about a former Toledo city councilwoman and attorney who will be sentenced in January for theft of between $500,000 and $1 million. The stolen funds appear to have come from numerous estates handled by Karyn McConnell-Hancock. This woman was charged earlier this year for faking her own kidnapping. Hancock’s husband and father, a Toledo Municipal Court judge, received national attention after an appearance on Good Morning America in which they cited a case related to the father/judge as potential motivation for the abduction.

Truth is stranger than fiction. And we wonder why our legal system is dysfunctional?

*Title by E.B post by EoD

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Your Response to the National Guardianship Assoc. Report Has Been Overwhelming

"Lawyers seek the creation of a new organisation which helps ensure lawyers are employed." No Pasaran
-------------------------------
Thank you for all your E mails. You all have made good points
pro and con. Here at E.A. your voice is heard.... Your feelings and thoughts are important... We'll try to publish them all .........

Open Letter to National Guardianship Asociation (NGA) from a Reader

To: Terry Hammond
Steven Fields
Re: 16th Annual Probate Bench/Bar

There was a distinct trend during the recent campaigns to focus on the irrelevant as a means to avoid dealing with substantive issues. You’ve taken that trend to a new high – focus on substantive issues irrelevantly. A few corrections:

1. “Best practices” are not and can never be understood by an examination of case law. Imagine if the hospitals or the schools used case law to determine the “best practices.” Books are written in a number of fields detailing how to determine the best practices of that field. I would wager much that not one of them uses the criteria of case law. Best practices in guardianship would need to be determined, minimally, by a comparison of goals and outcomes. Those best able to judge them would be the “ward,” those who love the ward, and disinterested bystanders.

2. You have standards for ethical and responsible guardianships. What a farce! Washington State has standards also. Neither the court nor the guardianship board that created those standards can be bothered to apply them. In Washington, almost the only way a guardian can be disciplined is by not paying dues – everything else is fair game – lies, theft, elder abuse – the list is endless. A complaint was submitted to you about two years ago. Your response – “File a police report.” No mention of doing your part and applying those standards you are touting!

3. The “relatives are restless.” Restless is what school children are when a beautiful day beacons and the teacher drones on and on. The relatives are not restless, they are outraged – and they have every right to be outraged.

They are characterized as “having something wrong with them.” Well, perfection is beyond our abilities and, in truth, we all have something wrong with us. That “wrongness” can and usually is mitigated by love and by an ability to use the resources available.

The relatives know that you are not in court fighting to control the life of a penniless person. You take it to court only when, like all good vultures, you smell a carcass to pick dry.

The relatives know you will use every innuendo to convince an already biased court to get them out of the picture. They know they will be smeared, not fairly appraised.

The relatives know you will submit hundreds of pages of charges that were unnecessary and that in no way can be shown to have benefitted the ward. They know that they can examine those charges and see scores of discussions, meetings, calls, visits etc that can never be verified.

They know that a parasitical attorney will leach onto the guardian and participate in every single word that is exchanged for hundreds of dollars an hour. They will recognize that a guardianship is little more than a welfare program for attorneys.

They know that in an unseemly amount of time, the guardianship will empty every single dollar your aged loved one sweated to earn and to save. They will remember the family conversations about the “family” assets – and how they will be used to avoid nursing homes or to send their grandkids to college. They know you will denigrate those memories and portray them as evidence of greed. But they also know, they are a part of every family’s planning and thinking.

They know that the guardian will sell the house as quickly as possible, only because that gives them a large pot of money share and adds to the ward’s dependence. They know also that all the mementos of their childhoods, all their family memories will tossed out or sold, the profits going back to the guardianship.

They know that if they complain about inferior medical care (once the money is in the guardians’ hands, they don’t want it wasted on medical care) or about wanting the ward to be with family, then the guardian will prohibit the family from seeing the ward. The courts have been shamelessly ready to grant such prohibitions in “the best interest of the ward.” The ward will be sentenced to painful medical procedures without the reassurance of loved ones. His or her days will end in loneliness and confusion, without the love and protection of family. This is the ugliest, nastiest abuse of all. I wrote to you two years ago and received a note indicating some disapproval of the practice. Have you once used your platform to try to end this horrific practice?


4. The press is not impressionable. That’s an easy and inaccurate out. We are all impressionable. Anyone hearing the tortured cries of the victims of guardianships will be, and should be, impressed. The press is responsible. There was no “other side” to the ugly stories coming out of LA. The press realized that crimes were being committed and as did the powers that be and the public. Those of us who care about this crime of the twenty-first century are going to continue to try to get word to the press of the horrific abuses being heaped upon our vulnerable citizens and their family.

Your paper and your arguments reflect the sleaziness of the guardianship program. What a waste to not use your position to try to help the program conform to the intention of the legislators and the needs of our vulnerable citizens and, instead, defend it so shallowly.

Sincerely,
Sharon Denney,Seattle,WA
http://www.guardianshipscam.com/

Ref: National Guardianship Association, "Emerging Trends , The Relative Are Restless" Download here=>> Document.pdf by Terry Hammond, Executive Director and Steven D. Fields and presented to the 16th Annual Probate Bar.

GOD HELP THE ELDERLY AND THEIR LOVED ONES IN AMERICA

I was forced into seeking guardianship to tryand stop my mother's tortures and blatant abuses. I ended up leaving mycareer which provided me with about 70k per year income.

I borrowed on my401K, I maxed out my credit cards. My financial costs are over 500K.

My mother's estate was not even enough to pay court costs; but, no amount of money in the world could replace the value of my dear mother.

I spent days and sleepless nights doing nothing but investigating the corruptions which led me to Allen Jones and the exposure of the Texas Medical Algorithm Project.

If we defend these criminals and I have little hope that the 2 individuals and their organizations are not included, we are just as sick, ethically andmorally challenged as they are.

Brenda Durant