Showing posts with label Laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laws. Show all posts

Sunday, January 9, 2011

False Complaints and the Florida Dept of Children and Families

On this Editorial for ElderAbuseHelp.Org I will quote an article By news-press.com Originally posted on February 09, 2007

"Floridians worried that a child or older adult is being abused can now report it online.
To report suspected abuse or neglect, go to the Web site of The Florida Department of Children and Families, www.dcf.state.fl.us/abuse/report.

Last year, there were about 348,000 abuse claims reported across the state.
In Lee County, there were 5,400 hot line calls.

The Web and phone system can be used to report concerns of abuse or neglect unless a child, elder, or person with disabilities is in immediate danger. In that case, call 911.A fax number, 800-914-0004, and a TDD number, 800-453-5145, for the deaf, hard of hearing or speech impaired are available to report abuse ".

We applaud any step in the right direction to make Elder Abuse reporting more accessible to complainants .

The DCF of Florida needs to have the ability to quickly differentiate between the perpetrators and the victims as time is of the essense with these cases. This is not always easy as Elder Abusers are shrewd and "the testator, misled by fraud, will often do so with pleasure and satisfaction.." - Dr. Irwin Perry M.D. J.D.

"An example of fraud is the situation where one influences a testator that another relative has stirred up trouble." - Irwin Perry M.D. J.D.

Florida Statutes 415.102 states :

(9) "False report" means a report of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult to the central abuse hot line which is not true and is maliciously made for the purpose of:

(a) Harassing, embarrassing, or harming another person;
(b) Personal financial gain for the reporting person;
(c) Acquiring custody of a vulnerable adult; or
(d) Personal benefit for the reporting person in any other private dispute involving a vulnerable adult.

The Division of Children and Families , and the Department of Elder affairs needs to have the resolve to have the provisions of Chapter 415.102 enforced and to develop a zero tolerance on Elder Abuse, this with the ability to move quickly to sort out the perpetrator from the victims will go a long ways in protecting our elders in the future.

Please email the DCF of Florida and express your own opinions and suggestions.
Their Communication contact list- The DCF Office of Communications contact list

By Ray Fernandez

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Florida Statute 825.103 Exploitation Laws : Why Are They Not Enforced?

(1) "Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult" means:

(a) Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who:

1. Stands in a position of trust and confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or

2. Has a business relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult; or

(b) Obtaining or using, endeavoring to obtain or use, or conspiring with another to obtain or use an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who knows or reasonably should know that the elderly person or disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent.

---------------------------------------

These are the 'LAWS" Why are the people who are paid our tax dollars, Looking the 'OTHER WAY'?

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Facts About the BAKER ACT

Submitted by attorney Maria Gallo credit Osceola Clerk of Court


What is a Baker Act?

A Baker Act is a means of providing individuals with emergency services and temporary detention for mental health evaluation and treatment when required, either on a voluntary or an involuntary basis.

How are voluntary and involuntary Baker Act Admissions different?

A voluntary Baker Act is when a person 18 years of age or older, or a parent or guardian of a person age 17 or under, makes application for admission to a facility for observation, diagnosis or treatment.

An involuntary Baker Act is when a person is taken to a receiving facility for involuntary examination when there is reason to believe that he or she is mentally ill and because of his or her mental illness, the person has refused voluntary examination; the person is unable to determine for himself or herself whether examination is necessary and without care or treatment, the person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself or herself and such refusal could pose a threat of harm to his or her well being; and there is a substantial likelihood that without care or treatment, the person will cause serious bodily harm to himself, herself or others in the near future as evidenced by recent behavior.

Are there other criteria to know if a Baker Act is appropriate?

Yes, there is additional criteria for a voluntary and involuntary Baker Act not included here. For example, a law enforcement officer may transport an individual to a facility for evaluation if there is reason to believe that the individual's behavior meets statutory guidelines for involuntary examination.

What is an ExParte Petition for Involuntary Examination?

If you are willing to swear in a Petition for Involuntary Examination that you have personally witnessed an individual causing harm to themselves or others, an "ExParte" for an Involuntary Examination can be completed at the Clerk's Office, Mental Health Division.

What is the procedure for filing the Petition and Affidavit Seeking ExParte Order Requiring Involuntary Examination?

A family member or interested person may fill out the petition and affidavit in the Clerk's Office. You will need to provide proper identification and have personally witnessed the individual's actions.

What happens after I file the Petition and Affidavit?

Your sworn affidavit will be reviewed by the court. If the court believes, based on the evidence provided in the petition and affidavit, the judge will enter an order for the sheriff to pick up and transport the person to the nearest receiving facility.

When will the order be served on the person?

The sheriff will make every attempt to take the person into custody and transport the person to a facility. If the person cannot be located by the sheriff, the sheriff will hold the order for seven (7) days and continue attempts to take the person into custody.

How long will the order hold the person in a facility?

A person may not be detained for more than 72 hours.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Destroying Citizens Trust of Our Courts

by Brenda Durant

A recent article in the Statesmen about Chief Justice Jefferson's plea for reform and discussions for the need to reform, shows that "too much is wrong in Texas".

Of-course there are laws which were put in place to deter such crimes against citizens, like the crime of "Criminal Official Mis-conduct", a felony. The problem is enforcement.

Local D.A.'s won't prosecute a member of the "good old boys club", and the Attorney General says that the Legislatures must first engage him to take action against those who have committed the most egregious crime, of destroying citizens trust of our courts which are supposed to serve and protect.

Following the money, we quickly see why our court rooms are turned into arena of deceits, robbing citizens of their rights, their trust of government, and even their lives. I found out too much, the hard way, in Hood County. I would have rather been taken out by terrorists from other countries than to be victimized by my own government, which I was once so proud of. Who are the real terrorists?

Citizens have the right and duty to demand accountability from those who are elected and appointed to serve and protect. I continue to do just that.

http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/02/12/0212judiciary.html

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Florida Guardianship Laws -A Strong Dose of Reality!

How is suppossed to work!

Least Restrictive Alternative Requirement F.S.§744.331(6)(b)

One of the major substantive changes to Florida Guardianship Law which was brought about by the October 1989 legislative revisions, was the requirement that there be no least restrictive available alternative to guardianship, before the court could appoint a guardian.The obvious advantage was to allow the court to consider factors other than whether or not the alleged incapacitated person was incapacitated, in determining whether or not to appoint a guardian.

Prior to the 1989 revisions, once a judge determined a person to be incompetent, the only remaining decision was who to appoint as guardian of the person and/or property.Since the 1989 legislative revisions, the court must take testimony and other evidence as to whether any least restrictive alternatives to guardianship exist, and if so, whether they are, or will, adequately meet the ward's needs.

If the court finds that there is a least restrictive alternative to guardianship which will sufficiently address some of the alleged incapacitated person's problems, the court cannot delegate rights to a guardian for the areas covered by the least restrictive alternative.

Proper planning by attorneys and guardians requires the recommendation of any least restrictive alternative to clients who need assistance. Before making such a recommendation, however, it must be determined that said alternative is appropriate under the circumstances and in the client's best interests.

How It Really Works!

If you are daughter or anyone acting in behalf, defense of the targeted ward; have a DPOA(Durable Power of Attorney); are legitimately entitled to information, etc.;__ YOU ARE AN OBSTACLE TO THE STRATAGEM. You will be demonized; accused of the exploitation the predators are perpetrating or the criminal actions of those who victimized you. Accusations of mental illness(ordered to get psychological testing from predator's associate_ fairly common tactic); drug addiction, etc.; no proof is necessary. Maybe the (covered)criminal will testify against you. You are not charged with anything; therefore you have no right to face your accuser and get evidence in your defense. Accusations are made off the court record, in the court hallway.
Elders are 'expected' to get ill and die, hence; this stratagem has been practiced on them for years. Death_ Terri style is without a court order; no public exposure; disabled now publicly initiated.

Felony crimes committed against you are suppressed, covered up, authorities will not prosecute the crimes against you because the predators are likely to use alleged criminal against you as witness(es), etc. The acknowledgment of crime might be obstacle to gaining guardianship over the targeted ward, which is the lock down of the "takings". Any and all 'obstacles' are removed with no regard for laws, crimes, human rights, abuse and exploitation. Obstruction of justice is a predator specialty. No law enforcement, remedy, recovery from the crimes committed against you_ allowed.

The ward's mail, finances, health care or lack, complete existence is taken over by the emergency temporary guardian/permanent guardian. Her family advocate, will be allowed no information at all. Family advocate becomes non-existent. The ward has no family, for all practical purposes. If family makes a complaint about the facility; they are not allowed to know the results, etc.; all information goes to the guardian.

Family has rights_ on paper; in reality, must know them; your attorney probably won't tell you. When you exercise them, you will be considered angry, aggressive or something equally negative. Sometimes you are punished and can never see your beloved 'ward' again.

This "war" goes on for years if you persist toward remedy. Your health is negatively effected from the constant stress and you have difficulty functioning as well as you did before HELL, which compounds the stress. Depression, anxiety, ulcers, cancer, or other chronic illnesses affect the ward and family.

Your financial losses are not recovered and you can easily become totally broke. A great deal of time is required for "pro se" litigation. Your family relations are difficult or shredded, due to abuse, loss, despair, extreme disillusionment, etc. This recipe is from my experience and many others; life changing .

The ward( your mother, daughter, family member) is held hostage while you spend most of your time and resources attempting to free her/him.
If you cannot free the ward, when she/he is no longer a profit producer(about the time limited medical treatment produces diminished health/illness) she/he will have a "duty to die". First, no food or water, when organs start to fail, some morphine, which hastens death by reducing respiration. "The above stratagem without truthful media exposure is silencing of the lambs".

Thursday, May 15, 2008

New York Governor Paterson Gets Serious On Elder Abuse

by Brooklyn Eagle (edit@brooklyneagle.net),

Assemblymember Alec Brook-Krasny (D-Coney Island, Dyker Heights) announced that Governor Paterson has signed into law a measure that makes assaulting a senior citizen a class D violent felony, helping curb predatory attacks by those who target the elderly (A.9818).

“Society cannot tolerate criminals who assault and abuse the elderly,” Brook-Krasny said. “Elder abuse is a heinous crime, and we must take immediate action to stop this type of violence.”

The new law will increase the penalty for assaulting a senior citizen from a class A misdemeanor to second-degree assault – a class D violent felony – if a person 65 years or older is assaulted by someone more than 10 years younger. “Our senior citizens deserve to feel safe and protected,” Brook-Krasny said. “This law will ensure that criminals who assault and victimize the elderly will be severely punished for their shameful behavior.”

The Assembly also passed legislation this year that will increase the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class E felony if more than one vulnerable elderly person is victimized by a scam artist (A.9813). An experienced elder law attorney was added to the state’s Crime Victims Board, providing valuable perspective for cases involving older New Yorkers (A.6204). New York State Police are also now required to develop educational materials and procedures relating to elder abuse to help with their cases (A.9905).

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

744.108 Guardian's and attorney's fees and expenses.--

(1) A guardian, or an attorney who has rendered services to the ward or to the guardian on the ward's behalf, is entitled to a reasonable fee for services rendered and reimbursement for costs incurred on behalf of the ward.

(2) When fees for a guardian or an attorney are submitted to the court for determination, the court shall consider the following criteria:

(a) The time and labor required;

(b) The novelty and difficulty of the questions involved and the skill required to perform the services properly;

(c) The likelihood that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment of the person;

(d) The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar services;

(e) The nature and value of the incapacitated person's property, the amount of income earned by the estate, and the responsibilities and potential liabilities assumed by the person;

(f) The results obtained;

(g) The time limits imposed by the circumstances;

(h) The nature and length of the relationship with the incapacitated person; and

(i) The experience, reputation, diligence, and ability of the person performing the service.

(3) In awarding fees to attorney guardians, the court must clearly distinguish between fees and expenses for legal services and fees and expenses for guardian services and must have determined that no conflict of interest exists.

(4) Fees for legal services may include customary and reasonable charges for work performed by legal assistants employed by and working under the direction of the attorney.

(5) All petitions for guardian's and attorney's fees and expenses must be accompanied by an itemized description of the services performed for the fees and expenses sought to be recovered.

(6) A petition for fees or expenses may not be approved without prior notice to the guardian and to the ward, unless the ward is a minor or is totally incapacitated.

(7) A petition for fees shall include the period covered and the total amount of all prior fees paid or costs awarded to the petitioner in the guardianship proceeding currently before the court.

(8) When court proceedings are instituted to review or determine a guardian's or an attorney's fees under subsection (2), such proceedings are part of the guardianship administration process and the costs, including fees for the guardian's attorney, shall be determined by the court and paid from the assets of the guardianship estate unless the court finds the requested compensation under subsection (2) to be substantially unreasonable.

History.--ss. 18, 26, ch. 75-222; s. 11, ch. 89-96; s. 5, ch. 90-271; s. 2, ch. 96-354; s. 7, ch. 2003-57.

Source=>>

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

FS 825.103 "Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult" means:

Title XLVI CRIMES

Chapter 825 ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION OF ELDERLY PERSONS AND DISABLED ADULTS

View Entire Chapter
825.103 Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties.--
(1) "Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult" means:
(a) Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who:

1. Stands in a position of trust and confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2. Has a business relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult; or
(b) Obtaining or using, endeavoring to obtain or use, or conspiring with another to obtain or use an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who knows or reasonably should know that the elderly person or disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent.

(2)(a) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(b) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $20,000 or more, but less than $100,000, the offender commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(c) If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult is valued at less than $20,000, the offender commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.--s. 4, ch. 95-158; s. 5, ch. 96-322; s. 1, ch. 97-78.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Florida Code of Judicial Conduct

the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct
by Judge Charles J. Kahn

Page 10

Most judges have come to realize that they cannot do their job without lawyers. Most lawyers have concluded that the obverse is also true. Although judges and lawyers meet in a formal context during court proceedings, many other less formal relationships and connections exist between judges and lawyers. Oftentimes, questions about such relationships and connections are governed by the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct (“the code”)1 and the opinions of the Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (JEAC or “the committee”).2 This article seeks to familiarize Florida lawyers with solutions to frequently occurring situations involving relationships between lawyers and judges.

Social Relationships Between Judges and Lawyers
Lawyers, like members of any profession, commonly form friendships among themselves, and these friendships may well endure beyond the time one of the lawyers takes the bench through election or appointment. Under Canon 2 of the code, “A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s activities.” In particular, “A judge shall not allow family, social, political, or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment.”3

Source =>>

In the United States, the term "recusal" is used most often with respect to court proceedings. Two sections of title 28 of the United States Code (the Judicial Code) providing standards for judicial disqualification or recusal. Section 455, captioned "Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge," provides that a federal judge "shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." The same section also provides that a judge is disqualified "where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding"; when the judge has previously served as a lawyer or witness concerning the same case or has expressed an opinion concerning its outcome; or when the judge or a member of his or her immediate family has a financial interest in the outcome of the proceeding.

28 U.S.C. sec. 144, captioned "Bias or prejudice of judge," provides that under circumstances, when a party to a case in a United States District Court files a "timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of an adverse party," the case shall be transferred to another judge.
The general rule is that to warrant recusal, a judge's expression of an opinion about the merits of a case or familiarity with the facts or the parties must have originated in a source outside the case itself. This is referred to in the United States as the "extra-judicial source rule" and was recognized as a general presumption, although not an invariable one, in the 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Liteky v. United States.

Source=>>

Friday, February 22, 2008

Mississippi Senate Passes Stronger Penalties for Elder Abuse

Jackson , Mississippi, USA Sun Herald.Com Elder Abusers in Mississippi will face harsher sentencing after thursdays legislation was passed to allow stronger penalties for a person found guilty of assaulting a person 65 or older. Senate Bill 2223 passed the Senate and moves to the House.
-----------------------------
Hooray to Southern States for taking the lead to criminalize Elder Abuse!

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Elder Abuse Training For Law Enforcement Should Be Required in Florida Also !

Elder abuse training required some States
-Why Not in Florida ? Which has an elevated elderly population.

Every city police officer and deputy sheriff at a supervisory level and below who is assigned to field or investigative duties is required to complete an elder abuse training course certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. This mandate came about following the passage of Assembly Bill 870, sponsored by the Attorney General, in 1997 (Chapter 444).

Friday, February 8, 2008

Florida Intestate Succession Fla Statutes 732.103

by Attorney David Goldman of the Florida Estate Planning Blog

When someone dies without a Florida Will Their property is distributed under the Florida Statutes. Chapter 732 define the order of succession to a decedent's property.

732.103 Share of other heirs.--The part of the intestate estate not passing to the surviving spouse under s. 732.102, or the entire intestate estate if there is no surviving spouse, descends as follows:

(1) To the descendants of the decedent.

(2) If there is no descendant, to the decedent's father and mother equally, or to the survivor of them.

(3) If there is none of the foregoing, to the decedent's brothers and sisters and the descendants of deceased brothers and sisters.

(4) If there is none of the foregoing, the estate shall be divided, one-half of which shall go to the decedent's paternal, and the other half to the decedent's maternal, kindred in the following order:

(a) To the grandfather and grandmother equally, or to the survivor of them.

(b) If there is no grandfather or grandmother, to uncles and aunts and descendants of deceased uncles and aunts of the decedent.

(c) If there is either no paternal kindred or no maternal kindred, the estate shall go to the other kindred who survive, in the order stated above.

(5) If there is no kindred of either part, the whole of the property shall go to the kindred of the last deceased spouse of the decedent as if the deceased spouse had survived the decedent and then died intestate entitled to the estate.

(6) If none of the foregoing, and if any of the descendants of the decedent's great-grandparents were Holocaust victims as defined in s. 626.9543(3)(a), including such victims in countries cooperating with the discriminatory policies of Nazi Germany, then to the descendants of the great-grandparents. The court shall allow any such descendant to meet a reasonable, not unduly restrictive, standard of proof to substantiate his or her lineage. This subsection only applies to escheated property and shall cease to be effective for proceedings filed after December 31, 2004.
If you think you may be entitled to a persons property, Contact a Florida Estate Planning Lawyer to help you determine if you could benefit from a Florida Probate

Monday, December 17, 2007

Senator Ronda Storms on the Vanguard to Close DCF Loopholes

TAMPA , FLORIDA - The Tampa Bay Online - Revised 12-17-07

When two child welfare workers were fired last year for claiming they had visited children, 'they hadn't', co-workers braced for more cases on top of their already heavy workload.

Overburdened workers are a chronic challenge for the Florida Department of Children & Families. And despite efforts in recent years to lessen the workload, more caseworkers are risking their jobs - even prison - by falsifying records.

In a case made public last week, a Miami worker accused of falsifying records, told investigators that with 63 children to visit each month, he had no other choice. Samuel Orejobi said his was an "impossible job", it made him ill, kept him from his children and drove him to fight with his wife.

Last fiscal year, the Inspector General's Office investigated 24 DCF and community-based-care employees suspected of falsifying records. Nine months into fiscal 2007, 32 workers have been investigated. Of those 32, 24 were found to have falsified records. Ten were fired, and 14 resigned.

But, "reorganization won't put an end to false reports", said Jeff Rainey, chief executive officer of private contractor Hillsborough Kids Inc.

"We've got pretty good checks and balances," Rainey said. "But we can't stop it. The system we have in place can only deter it."

A Legal Loophole -
In 2002, the disappearance of 5-year-old Rilya Wilson in Miami, made national news when law enforcement officials discovered that DCF hadn't checked on the foster girl in 15 months.
Rilya has never been found. Her case led to the resignation of a DCF secretary and yet another overhaul of a system that critics argue continues to fail children.

Since 2002, when state law made falsifying child welfare records a 'third-degree felony', punishable by up to five years in prison, only three child welfare workers have been convicted.
"More cases could result in convictions", Inspector General Sheryl Steckler said, "and if lawmakers plugged a loophole: A worker has to alter, destroy, overwrite or delete a record before it is considered falsified".

"Nowhere does the law mention the word 'create", Steckler said. The result: "Our state attorneys are struggling to file charges."

In the closing days of the 2007 legislative session, state lawmakers are discussing Senate Bill 1394, which calls for 'rewording the law'. "A House bill is being drafted", Steckler said.

It took a year for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to charge Robin Schofield of Tampa with two counts of falsifying records. She was fired March 9, 2006.
Schofield, a former Children's Home caseworker, claimed to have visited a client on a day she didn't work. An internal review found two other cases in which Schofield, with three months on the job, falsified reports.

Schofield did not file mileage forms - "a red flag to managers that someone might be falsifying a report".

Her firing soon was followed by another. On March 29, 2006, Margaret "Peggy" Haq, a one-time supervisor in Tampa who had four years on the job, was let go.
An internal review uncovered 12 false entries by Haq in a computer system designed to monitor children's care. One of the children, who hadn't been seen by a caseworker in three months, landed in juvenile detention for 21 days. A month later, he ran away from his sister's home.

She Tells A Different Story -
FDLE has not filed charges against Haq. In an interview with The Tampa Tribune, she said she was fired for 'speaking out against a supervisor during a court proceeding'. Haq described a system that functioned on falsehoods. As a supervisor, Haq said, she carried 48 cases and, later, as a caseworker, 30. Some workers had as many as 60 cases, she said.

Workers were pressured to see children in the first 20 days, Haq said. She got bogged down in paperwork, she said, and didn't have time to file mileage reports. When she couldn't visit children, her supervisor told her to report she had, Haq said. After Haq was fired, she went to work for a Clearwater Child Welfare Agency, Directions for Mental Health.

Haq was hired there one year ago, on April 21, 2006. Her last day was Jan. 9. Haq said she again was fired for falsifying records. "I was doing what I was told."
Haq told Directions officials the termination from The Children's Home was a "misunderstanding," said Thomas Riggs, president and chief executive officer of the Clearwater agency.

Workers are carefully screened, with references checked, Riggs said. Directions was not aware that Haq's misunderstanding included being fired for making false reports, Rigg said.
"We do not have a record showing either a telephone or written reference request being made regarding Ms. Haq's employment with us," said Lisa Braswell, director of public education and communications at The Children's Home. "If we receive a reference request over the phone, our standard procedure is to simply verify title and the dates of employment."

Parker, a director at The Children's Home in Tampa, doesn't believe a supervisor would tell a worker to lie about seeing a child. And she can't imagine any worker agreeing to do it.

"Most of them would rather say 'I didn't do it' than lie," Parker said. "The consequences are a whole lot less harsh."

A Long List Of Duties -
When a caseworker can't get to a child in a month as mandated by law, The Children's Home will tap another worker to make the visit. The agency has hired more people when caseloads start to creep toward 35, Parker said.

Sometimes workers may fear they'll lose their jobs, but it becomes a disciplinary issue only if they repeatedly can't make their required visits, she said. "It may mean they're overwhelmed."
That easily can happen, given the amount of work each case requires. Only once a child protective investigator determines a child needs outside supervision, caseworkers begin the process of monitoring the child's care.

The to-do list can seem endless - visiting children in their homes each month, keeping chronological notes of court hearings, meeting with parents, transporting children to doctor's appointments, overseeing visits with brothers and sisters, and entering all the information into a computer file.

The list grew when DCF relinquished its child welfare duties to 20 community-based care groups statewide. In the Tampa Bay area, Hillsborough Kids and Sarasota Family YMCA employ caseworkers and contract with smaller agencies to provide the services in Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Manatee and DeSoto counties.

That's for the better, said Parker, a former caseworker who recalls having 40 to 60 cases at a time at DCF. The Children's Home, one of those smaller agencies, has a staff of 22 caseworkers that handles 537 cases. Teams are made up of six caseworkers and a supervisor who has access to all cases and conducts monthly reviews. When caseworkers give notice, the agency asks them to stay 30 days or until replacements are hired, Parker said. Turnover is about 3 percent annually.

"There's a lot more cohesiveness," she said. "More of a team approach. It's not just a caseworker by herself anymore."

Steps To Reducing The Load -
Since taking the helm at Hillsborough Kids in 2005, Rainey added the subcontractors to help oversee care for 4,400 children. The move reduced caseloads among all workers and allowed for better supervision, Rainey said.

Workers are closing cases more quickly, within 20 months on average, he said. Federal and state performance measures call for closing cases within a year.
Turnover dropped from 15 percent in recent years to 8 percent this year. Caseloads on average stand at 22.

Since February, supervisors have been calling foster parents to verify a visit by a YMCA worker, said Lee Johnson, the YMCA's executive vice president.
Foster parents also are invited to attend meetings in which caseworkers and others discuss the child's care, Johnson said. That provides another opportunity to double-check on visits.

In addition, the Inspector General's Office will start attending supervisors meetings to provide training on the risks and consequences of falsifying client records, Johnson said.
It's all part of a move to ensure that quality care has been delivered when a box is checked off the to-do list, said Nick Cox, DCF's new Suncoast regional director.

"We need to spend quality time with children," the former state prosecutor said, "not just a drive-by."

Careful Monitoring Is A Must -
As DCF continues to ferret out fraudulent reports, agency Secretary Bob Butterworth said he still wants caseworkers to feel they can work without fear of punishment for failing to meet expectations. That fear, he suspects, leads some to lie.

"We'll never stop it," he said while in Tampa recently. But the former Florida attorney general vowed his agency wouldn't tolerate it, either. The shift to community-based care groups requires monitoring. "I'm concerned about the CBCs," Butterworth said last week. "I've been traveling around the state and hearing their caseloads are too high."

He said caseworkers also inform him they're afraid to tell supervisors they can't do the job because they will be fired. Butterworth can't force the community-based agencies that contract with DCF to change the work environment, at least not yet. But future contracts will include protections for workers who come forward, he said.

"I want them to stand up and tell us when they can't visit a child because they have too many cases," Butterworth said.

"If we can't do the job because we don't have enough people, maybe that will get the Legislature's attention."

Reporter Sherri Ackerman can be reached at (813) 259-7144 or

sackerman@tampatrib.com.

WHAT'S NEXT -
Senate Bill 1394: Children, Families and Elder Affairs Committee bill.
Attached to the reorganization of the Florida Department of Children & Families, a section of the bill calls for changing the wording of Statute 839.13 to include the word "create" as it pertains to falsifying state records. The Senate passed the bill Thursday. It awaits hearings by the Judiciary and Health & Human Services Appropriations committees. Similar bill language is being considered by the House.

Sponsor: Sen. Ronda Storms, R-Valrico, chairwoman of the Children, Families and Elder Affairs Committee; storms.ronda.web@flsenate.gov; (850) 487-5072

Track the bills at http://www.flhouse.gov/ and http://www.flsenate.gov/

Article abridged entire article archived here >>

Friday, December 14, 2007

Florida Statues 709.8 - Re: Power Of Attorney Benefit Of Agent

This piece of legislature, is for our Elders benefit. But it exempts elder abusers and other minorities , the law should be enforced to include everyone !

Because as it stands .. if you can trick the Elder into giving you Power of Attorney, you can take over his or hers entire estate and then with the added money and power you can intimidate and discredit any relatives that come forward into submission while the Elder is carted off to a retirement home or just about anywhere, and never to be heard from again.

Unless plainly and clearly provided, the authority granted the attorney in fact is to act for the benefit of the principal, not for the agents benefit.
-Section 2(D) Fla Statues 709.8


---------------------------------

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Unfair Treatment of Reporters of Elder Abuse

It is most disturbing that reporters of elder abuse cases to authorities in various countries, often resulted in the reporters themselves been investigated! Motives are questioned.

Why? Perhaps it is easier for authorities to suspect the motive of the reporter than to investigate the reported case.

I now know of several cases where the reporters of elder abuse have been suspected of ‘unsavory motive’ and investigated. One case is still ‘in progress’ after a few years of legal wrangling.

It is NOT encouraging for any potential ‘whistle blowers’ or reporters of Elder Abuse.
We need support NOT investigation into our motives.

Are there no one in our 21st century who can be considered generous and altruistic.

Have we become so materialistic that nothing done can be judged as an act of altruism or humanity?

For those in charge of various government programs in the fight to prevent elder abuse; please listen to us. How can you expect people in the community to assist, if you treat the reporters with suspicion and contempt? Let's face it, the victim often DO NOT report the abuses. It is often left to a caring relative, friend or neighbour. Do not wait till your department is called by the police or funeral house director before you act!

This post is not to discourage others in reporting elder abuse. It is just that some issues need to be sorted out by authorities regarding the health and safety of the elderly. In their next conference or staff ‘in service’ seminar; perhaps they can look at this problem.

We are currently gathering information on cases where reporters of elder abuse get investigated or called into question about their ‘motives’.

Please contact me via email if you have similar experience.

By Andrew

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Are There Laws Regarding Turn Key Guardians and How Guardians are Chosen?

by Maria Gallo, Esquire

F.S. 744.3031 For Emergency Guardianship Petition

The statute allowing for an Emergency Temporary Guardianship is § 744.3031(1).

According to the statute, an Emergency Temporary Guardianship is for those situations where it is necessary to provide immediate care after a petition to determine incapacity has been filed but before the appointment of a plenary guardian.

Once a plenary guardian has been appointed, he or she may only be replaced or removed as directed in Florida statute and Florida probate rules (which also apply to guardianship proceedings).

The plenary guardian must resign and properly petition for discharge. Such resignation and the petition for discharge must be noticed to interested parties. The notice should include a provision advising of a 30 day period to object to the resignation as provided in Florida Probate Rule 5.650(d).

As part of this discharge, the plenary guardian would also be required to file his or her final accounting.

A discharge petition must contain the guardian's wish to resign, the amount of compensation to be paid to the guardian and others employed by the guardian, and the name of any successor guardian (if any) or that a successor guardian needs to be appointed. (See Florida Probate Rule 5.650 (b).)

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Guardianship and Probate Practices – Little Has Changed

The following article first appeared on December 2005

A Family Feud Sheds Light on Differences in Probate Practices From State to State
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL Published: December 28, 2005

HOUSTON, Dec. 20 - Lillian Glasser, by all accounts, never intended to spend her twilight years in Texas. Or her $25 million fortune.
A lifelong New Jerseyan, Mrs. Glasser owned a million-dollar home and a second house in Highland Park, N.J., with her husband Ben, a doctor who died in 2002.
But to the consternation of Mrs. Glasser and the New Jersey authorities, Texas now has a major grip on her life and her money - a consequence of a family feud and anomalies in probate practices from state to state.
After coming to Texas last February to visit her daughter, Mrs. Glasser, now 85 and afflicted with Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's, fell subject to the Bexar County Probate Court in San Antonio.
Placed under Texas guardianship after her daughter attested that her mother resided there, Mrs. Glasser is largely confined to a gated apartment complex in Alamo Heights, a small city surrounded by San Antonio, under 24-hour care and forbidden to return to New Jersey while a storm of litigation swirls around her.
Beyond the personal drama, the case highlights the checkerboard practices of local probate courts, which govern the transfer of property from people who die or are declared incompetent. The courts are not federally regulated, but in response to a growing number of interstate disputes, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws is drafting nationwide probate standards similar to those in the field of child custody.
The Glasser case, pitting her daughter and former guardian, Suzanne Matthews of Alamo Heights, against her son, Mark Glasser of Miami, has already consumed nearly $3 million of Mrs. Glasser's assets, accumulated over years of successful investing…..

In an independent evaluation in July, Dr. Katherine E. Goethe, a San Antonio psychologist, said, "Her situation in San Antonio I would describe as a form of psychological torture, frankly."

Abridged Article SOURCE

------------------------------
Little has changed with regards to guardianship and probate practices. People like Mrs Glasser and Clara Fernandez should have a secured, dignified life in their twilight years. NOT to be victimized by state laws. NOT to be "robbed" of their hard-earned assets by the people who are supposed to protect her. There should be uniformed laws in all states on these issues.

Posted by Andrew

Thursday, October 25, 2007

744.3215 Rights of Persons Determined Incapacitated.--

1) A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right:

(a) To have an annual review of the guardianship report and plan.

(b) To have continuing review of the need for restriction of his or her rights.

(c) To be restored to capacity at the earliest possible time.

(d) To be treated humanely, with dignity and respect, and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

(e) To have a qualified guardian.

(f) To remain as independent as possible, including having his or her preference as to place and standard of living honored, either as he or she expressed or demonstrated his or her preference prior to the determination of his or her incapacity or as he or she currently expresses his or her preference, insofar as such request is reasonable.

(g) To be properly educated.

(h) To receive prudent financial management for his or her property and to be informed how his or her property is being managed, if he or she has lost the right to manage property.

(i) To receive services and rehabilitation necessary to maximize the quality of life.

(j) To be free from discrimination because of his or her incapacity.

(k) To have access to the courts.

(l) To counsel.

(m) To receive visitors and communicate with others.

(n) To notice of all proceedings related to determination of capacity and guardianship, unless the court finds the incapacitated person lacks the ability to comprehend the notice.

(o) To privacy.

(2) Rights that may be removed from a person by an order determining incapacity but not delegated to a guardian include the right:

(a) To marry. If the right to enter into a contract has been removed, the right to marry is subject to court approval.
(b) To vote.
(c) To personally apply for government benefits.
(d) To have a driver's license.
(e) To travel.
(f) To seek or retain employment.

(3) Rights that may be removed from a person by an order determining incapacity and which may be delegated to the guardian include the right:

(a) To contract.
(b) To sue and defend lawsuits.
(c) To apply for government benefits.
(d) To manage property or to make any gift or disposition of property.
(e) To determine his or her residence.
(f) To consent to medical and mental health treatment.
(g) To make decisions about his or her social environment or other social aspects of his or her life.

(4) Without first obtaining specific authority from the court, as described in s. 744.3725, a guardian may not:

(a) Commit the ward to a facility, institution, or licensed service provider without formal placement proceeding, pursuant to chapter 393, chapter 394, or chapter 397.
(b) Consent on behalf of the ward to the performance on the ward of any experimental biomedical or behavioral procedure or to the participation by the ward in any biomedical or behavioral experiment. The court may permit such performance or participation only if:
1. It is of direct benefit to, and is intended to preserve the life of or prevent serious impairment to the mental or physical health of the ward; or
2. It is intended to assist the ward to develop or regain his or her abilities.
(c) Initiate a petition for dissolution of marriage for the ward.
(d) Consent on behalf of the ward to termination of the ward's parental rights.
(e) Consent on behalf of the ward to the performance of a sterilization or abortion procedure on the ward.


History.--s. 34, ch. 89-96; s. 19, ch. 90-271; s. 36, ch. 93-39; s. 13, ch. 94-183; s. 44, ch. 96-169; s. 6, ch. 96-354; s. 1782, ch. 97-102; s. 10, ch. 2006-178.
Copyright © 1995-2007 The Florida Legislature
•

Attempts to Hold Editor of E.A. for Contempt Charges On Friday, October 26th, 2007 in Honorable Judge David J. Audlin Jr. Unfounded!

The hearing will be held on Friday ,October 26, 2007 at The Honorable Circuit Judge David J. Audlin Jr. Court on 502 Whitehead Street 33040 on the 4th Floor at 9:30 AM .

Clara G. Fernandez has waited a VERY long time to get "her day in court", this is not about us, or about a family feud, this is all about Clara, and Clara's family, which believes Clara was held against her will, abused, and that her money and personal items was unapproprietly taken from her while she was sick, frail and under undo stress.

To take the attention away from such pressing issues by confusing the issues with conclusory statements that are "long on opinion and short on substance", is wrong!

Clara does not do well in nursing homes, not many elders do, (Last time Clara was separated from us, her family members, she was put in 5 nursing homes), according to Medicare records. While Clara was in the Key West Convelesent Center in Key West, she only ate with much cuing and was on 5x day insuling shots.

Since being home, Clara is bright, articulate, and she is now off the insulin shots due to proper dietary practices administered by her care-givers/her family. Clara keeps a very busy daily regiment as she prefers, and is always accompanied by family members and close friends that she is very deeply attached to.

In the beginning when Clara was returned to her family home and family members, we took her for an examination by her Doctors, they in turn diagnosed Clara as having P.S.S. (Post Stress Syndrome.)

Now the whole family is stressed out because of the situation created by the uncertainty created by Clara's guardianship which is the most restrictive means of governing an elder, even when allegations of "Elder Abuse" could never be substantiated agaisnt her present caregivers.






Copies of the Wards assets have been posted here on this blog-site prompting an investigation for 11 months now. Credible sources have tried to tell the authorities about Widows Quit Claim Deed Parties , disclosing all of Clara's assets, bonds, accounts, stock accounts, certificate of deposits, and real estate that was taken from her while she was drugged with the help of the little black bag.

Paragraph 7,
States that the "Wards" assets are at a substantial risk from myself, again, nothing to substatiate such a charge or statement, it is a shame that unproven and defamatory statements like this are allowed to take the attention from the real issues facing Clara's life today.

Clara's caregivers have been cleared numerous times by the DCF, cleared from the numerous complaints filed by the very same people who abused, robbed and incapacitated Clara, and in every incident the DCF found those complaints to be without base.
This is called a conclusory statement , again, these are statements that "long on conclusions and short on supporting evidence."
The guardian's attorney tells the court and the court then mirrors that misinformation as "factual evidence." - This is scary stuff indeed!

Paragraph 12,
States as fact, that I called or filed a complaint with the DCF and it was being submitted to the court as evidence. This in itself is a serious offense according to the Florida Bar Association.
"Whoever called in the DCF complaint did so after seeing that Clara was having to eat cheap TV dinners because her care-givers had not been given enough money by Clara's court appointed guardian to cover her groceries, and to add insult to injury, the guardian kept insisting that Clara's caregivers pay rent to stay in her home while taking care of Clara."
Elder care is more costly than child care and it also takes several abled bodied persons to physically lift and maneuver an elderly person once they are totally incapacitated.
Paragraph 16,
The attorney is now acting a psychiatrist and enters evidence to court that the 'Ward' is "scared by me," this is a very serious accusation and the Ward's family and friends would like to know what evidence the guardian's attorney has base this on?

Paragraph 21, Now the 'Ward' tells any ones who listens that she feels " Very Well" being with us. This is a factual statement backed by all DCF interviews, however, truth is falling by the wayside and Clara's real life issues are not being properly addressed.

Paragraph 23,
States, "I forced the guardian to consult with an attorney regarding a DCF a complaint against him that I did not file." - This type of craziness is what the 'Ward' Clara G. Fernandez is being charged up to $650.00 per hour for. An expense that no elder would tolerate nor approve of.

Paragraph 13, Is a serious misrepresentation! It is an established fact, that prior to the guardianship established on June 8Th, 2007, all of the Ward's bills were paid and kept up to date and this had been documented and presented to the court during the "Hearing to determine Continuing Need for a Guardian." -- Yes,.....Copies of all the paid bills were introduced as evidence to the court.

In an effort to discredit Clara's legally appointed caregivers, the guardian's attorney and the guardian both decided that the guardian should resign immediately from the case rather than discredit themselves.

In paragraph 8.-
"I now have imaginary step children that I did not know that had, and that I support these imaginary step children with the imaginary money that I supposedly maxed out of the Ward's credit line."
--"How crazy can this toxic spectacle become before the world?"
Doesn't it give you readers of E.A. a warm fuzzy feeling just knowing that when you get old and incapacitated this could very well happen to you?
And if you ever become a care giver for your family member, Remember, "Anyone can file an Elder Abuse complaint against you as a care giver,....even if it's unfounded!" -Considered yourself warned as well as educated on the existing situation with the system that was developed and set into place to protect and serve elders and their care givers.